Andy Ruiz Jr. could lose IBF title, Bob Arum lobbies for Kubrat Pulev shot
Kubrat Pulev has begun moves to stop Andy Ruiz Jr. and Anthony Joshua facing each other for a second time later this year.
The Bulgarian IBF #1-rated heavyweight contender and his team have officially petitioned the IBF.
They are requesting they order their world champion, Andy Ruiz, to postpone his rematch with former champ Anthony Joshua. In essence, to make Ruiz follow through on an immediate mandatory defense against Pulev.
Team Pulev say their fighter has earned the right to an immediate title fight by winning two IBF eliminators (October 27, 2018, when he defeated IBF #3-rated Hughie Fury and May 7, 2016, when he defeated former European champion and world title challenger Dereck Chisora). And by staying active against top competition.
For example, on March 23 of this year, he knocked out WBA #14-rated Bogdan Dinu on ESPN.
Pulev had originally been scheduled to face then-champion Anthony Joshua on October 28, 2017, in Cardiff, Wales, but was forced to withdraw due to injury.
Joshua went on to defeat substitute opponent Carlos Takam. Then make two more defenses then lose to Ruiz by TKO 7 in June of this year without facing Pulev.
And now, even though long-time IBF mandatory challenger Pulev has re-earned his spot as the IBF mandatory by beating Fury, Joshua’s promoter, Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Boxing has made clear he and Joshua intend to exercise their contractual right to an immediate rematch against Ruiz.
“We’ve been waiting patiently. The time is now,” said Bob Arum, founder and CEO of Top Rank, which co-promotes Pulev along with Epic Sports. “Andy Ruiz has an obligation to fight #1 mandatory IBF contender Kubrat Pulev.”
Ruiz himself is an indirect beneficiary of the IBF’s respected reputation for strictly adhering to its rules.
When Tyson Fury defeated Wladimir Klitschko to win the IBF title, the Klitschko camp exercised its contractual right to an immediate rematch with Fury.
When Fury then refused to fight his IBF mandatory, opting for the more lucrative rematch with Klitschko. The IBF correctly vacated the title. They ordered the two leading available contenders, Vyacheslav Glazkov and Charles Martin, to fight for the vacant IBF title.
Martin defeated Glazkov to become the IBF champion. In Martin’s first defense of the IBF title, he lost to Joshua.
This, in fact, was Joshua’s first bout for a major heavyweight title. Ruiz, who has now acquired the IBF title by defeating Joshua, is therefore the indirect beneficiary of the IBF’s policy of strictly complying with its rules.
Ruiz should therefore also be held to the IBF Rules and ordered to fight the IBF No. 1 available contender, Pulev, in his next bout.
In another example, superstar fighter Gennady Golovkin was stripped of his IBF middleweight title in 2018 after choosing to face Vanes Martirosyan and failing to set up a mandatory defense against Ukrainian Sergiy Derevyanchenko. Daniel Jacobs then won the title by beating Derevyanchenko in a fight for the vacant belt.
“I was ready to face Anthony Joshua in November. Now I’m eager to challenge Andy Ruiz,” said Pulev. I will fight Ruiz anywhere in the world. Let’s make it happen.”